Best Known (53, 109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(53, 109, 114)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 109, 114)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 36, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 73, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (8, 36, 40)-net over F9, using
(53, 109, 189)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (53, 109, 189)-net over F9, using
(53, 109, 7305)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 109, 7306)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 103 193498 284139 950520 699400 716908 204878 203980 555888 342761 538070 674088 888190 921822 835208 471498 710672 053825 > 9109 [i]