Best Known (63, 109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63, 109, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 109, 344)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (63, 112, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 56, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 56, 172)-net over F81, using
(63, 109, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (63, 109, 452)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (63, 110, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 55, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 55, 226)-net over F81, using
(63, 109, 39218)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 109, 39219)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 102 926686 929845 177656 457773 673265 466718 678754 447566 996707 166001 901862 337777 006716 502992 843050 044284 933673 > 9109 [i]