Best Known (46, 110, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 110, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 110, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 110, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 110, 88)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(46, 110, 88)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 111, 88)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 74, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 74, 88)-net over F27, using
(46, 110, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 110, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 110, 3028)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 110, 3029)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 931 748261 438773 635192 089532 435240 630049 652631 179659 973022 440461 256939 458122 536938 505858 785146 667326 404865 > 9110 [i]