Best Known (23, 112, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 112, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 112, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 112, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 112, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 112, 524)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 112, 525)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 111, 525)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8780 526010 256318 059689 795796 448552 610935 355253 053964 822305 048319 298506 664708 992193 455907 246956 065212 525409 > 9111 [i]