Best Known (101, 116, s)-Nets in Base 9
(101, 116, 2396742)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 116, 2396742)-net over F9, using
- 92 times duplication [i] based on digital (99, 114, 2396742)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (42, 57, 1198371)-net over F81, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8157, 1198371, F81, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975508, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8157, 8388598, F81, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388541, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8157, large, F81, 15) (dual of [large, large−57, 16]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523361 | 818−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8157, large, F81, 15) (dual of [large, large−57, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8157, 8388598, F81, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388541, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8157, 1198371, F81, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975508, 16]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (42, 57, 1198371)-net over F81, using
(101, 116, large)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (101, 116, large)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (101, 118, large)-net over F9, using
(101, 116, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 116, large)-net in base 9, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 103, large)-net in base 9, but