Best Known (46, 116, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 116, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 116, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 116, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(46, 116, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(46, 116, 82)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (46, 117, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 78, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 78, 82)-net over F27, using
(46, 116, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 116, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 116, 2506)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 116, 2507)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 493 230362 672869 577201 137000 565687 372013 528077 272383 429025 399723 665291 709795 561625 994735 864121 118853 740480 881545 > 9116 [i]