Best Known (68, 119, s)-Nets in Base 9
(68, 119, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 119, 344)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 122, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 61, 172)-net over F81, using
(68, 119, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (68, 119, 452)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (68, 120, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 60, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 60, 226)-net over F81, using
(68, 119, 40588)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 119, 40589)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (68, 118, 40589)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 39889 394964 976153 636959 728414 386544 739862 860746 096040 982716 503038 942387 371444 321644 679464 419758 021781 205405 339433 > 9118 [i]