Best Known (48, 120, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 120, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 120, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 120, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 120, 84)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(48, 120, 84)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 80, 84)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 83)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 83)-sequence over F27, using
(48, 120, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 120, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 120, 2684)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 120, 2685)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3 235775 754091 184229 342843 401262 643206 733417 841305 501326 387003 591185 140440 728530 640809 893000 871579 644448 234718 330145 > 9120 [i]