Best Known (48, 122, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 122, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 122, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 122, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 122, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(48, 122, 82)-net in base 9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (48, 123, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 82, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 82, 82)-net over F27, using
(48, 122, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 122, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 122, 2543)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 122, 2544)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 264 019481 980026 909402 528328 624203 068488 206146 688178 415410 145030 232297 664416 673012 010959 742580 363628 417026 455287 040385 > 9122 [i]