Best Known (86, 122, s)-Nets in Base 9
(86, 122, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 122, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 18, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (68, 104, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 18, 10)-net over F9, using
(86, 122, 3702)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (86, 122, 3702)-net over F9, using
(86, 122, 2771290)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 122, 2771291)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 261 569699 688444 086427 785131 401125 981383 663450 139533 804031 217971 879788 095908 738268 855847 246817 106060 900769 941374 244273 > 9122 [i]