Best Known (50, 123, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 123, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 123, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 123, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(50, 123, 88)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(50, 123, 88)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 82, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
(50, 123, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 123, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 123, 3036)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 123, 3037)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 122, 3037)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 263 832353 731402 165468 342731 876347 773078 565064 365617 762775 072139 804548 101024 871212 892975 829932 581738 715947 671857 307937 > 9122 [i]