Best Known (60, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9
(60, 125, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 125, 128)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (60, 128, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 47, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 81, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 47, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(60, 125, 201)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (60, 125, 201)-net over F9, using
(60, 125, 7950)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 125, 7951)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 124, 7951)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21194 413023 956389 259827 222409 900826 474994 924792 684957 790411 487876 848808 164737 824721 490086 688141 129241 159331 946313 756417 > 9124 [i]