MinT - Best Known (95, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (95, 125, s)-Nets in Base 9

(95, 125, 940)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (95, 125, 940)-net over F₉, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 126, 940)-net over F₉, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (17, 32, 200)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 100)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. digital (63, 94, 740)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(95, 125, 18944)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (95, 125, 18944)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(95, 125, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (95, 125, large)-net in base 9, because

28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 97, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]