Best Known (62, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9
(62, 126, 138)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (62, 126, 138)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 45, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 81, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 45, 64)-net over F9, using
(62, 126, 223)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (62, 126, 223)-net over F9, using
(62, 126, 9124)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (62, 126, 9125)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 721107 639843 450646 066256 710412 721327 347217 810588 751907 630891 069204 726837 563277 250975 370415 934311 541499 374153 359133 272321 > 9126 [i]