MinT - Best Known (96, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (96, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9

(96, 126, 972)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (96, 126, 972)-net over F₉, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (19, 34, 232)-net over F₉, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 116)-net over F₈₁, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F₈₁, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (62, 92, 740)-net over F₉, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 46, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(96, 126, 20434)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (96, 126, 20434)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(96, 126, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (96, 126, large)-net in base 9, because

28 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 98, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]