Best Known (63, 127, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63, 127, 138)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 127, 138)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (63, 129, 138)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 83, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(63, 127, 232)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (63, 127, 232)-net over F9, using
(63, 127, 9774)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 127, 9775)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 492597 157354 366896 471770 532158 893855 117287 903642 213791 144311 486349 417400 045433 428701 050289 964756 913372 736975 799818 686209 > 9127 [i]