Best Known (61, 128, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 128, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 128, 128)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 131, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 83, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(61, 128, 199)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 128, 199)-net over F9, using
(61, 128, 7718)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 128, 7719)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 127, 7719)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 491259 250542 197448 512125 473360 711145 162046 053053 740235 700799 260361 229245 373499 892455 311750 417220 550265 019070 664064 813113 > 9127 [i]