Best Known (23, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 129, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 129, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 129, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 129, 509)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 129, 510)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1372 670752 095191 243758 485215 324223 272530 502910 801431 260332 298271 684463 243165 756215 682424 277804 810289 801526 241807 676509 726001 > 9129 [i]