Best Known (24, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 129, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 129, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 129, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 129, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 129, 533)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 129, 534)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 128, 534)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 151 298177 254928 653405 463737 785625 148138 348687 537167 067209 706221 758181 096063 131379 263793 499378 807215 235638 666827 259011 785025 > 9128 [i]