Best Known (47, 130, s)-Nets in Base 9
(47, 130, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 130, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 130, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(47, 130, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (47, 130, 162)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (46, 130, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
(47, 130, 2003)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 130, 2004)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 129, 2004)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1262 187561 084336 443873 996312 860501 126505 441248 811498 028473 445265 087503 704429 224252 558121 773967 177608 271442 990950 924720 296353 > 9129 [i]