Best Known (35, 132, s)-Nets in Base 9
(35, 132, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 132, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 132, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 132, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 132, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 132, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 132, 912)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 132, 913)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 131, 913)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 103279 137069 455571 725185 156458 176534 843885 004220 450998 619795 678481 240313 341692 733045 867622 666568 047693 927528 982634 613375 419265 > 9131 [i]