MinT - Best Known (103, 135, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (103, 135, s)-Nets in Base 9

(103, 135, 972)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (103, 135, 972)-net over F₉, using

9¹ times duplication [i] based on digital (102, 134, 972)-net over F₉, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (101, 134, 972)-net over F₉, using
  - (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
    1. digital (20, 36, 232)-net over F₉, using
      - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F₈₁, using
        net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
    2. digital (65, 98, 740)-net over F₉, using
      - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
        net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(103, 135, 22224)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (103, 135, 22224)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(103, 135, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (103, 135, large)-net in base 9, because

30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 105, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]