Best Known (61, 138, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 138, 108)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 138, 108)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 44, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 94, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (6, 44, 34)-net over F9, using
(61, 138, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 138, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(61, 138, 5152)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 138, 5153)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 137, 5153)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 53874 163450 486706 374878 532292 726227 589543 360995 102896 235423 011699 771171 354246 249149 519675 428362 337454 034346 688241 192579 606807 110385 > 9137 [i]