Best Known (61, 140, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 140, 106)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 140, 106)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 44, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 96, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 44, 32)-net over F9, using
(61, 140, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 140, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(61, 140, 4821)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 140, 4822)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 139, 4822)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 368374 818666 525484 820087 368148 899571 680876 901488 872307 217566 845272 210338 251388 683734 250764 742087 734979 849063 237645 512969 448333 914385 > 9139 [i]