Best Known (98, 141, s)-Nets in Base 9
(98, 141, 760)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 141, 760)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 23, 20)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (75, 118, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (2, 23, 20)-net over F9, using
(98, 141, 3319)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (98, 141, 3319)-net over F9, using
(98, 141, 2494693)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 141, 2494694)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (98, 140, 2494694)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 39 260416 524673 218420 201738 426931 042805 127234 989806 335638 353693 293727 239787 105204 391729 247000 172131 038104 892486 782425 135895 373504 560497 > 9140 [i]