Best Known (26, 143, s)-Nets in Base 9
(26, 143, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 143, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 143, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(26, 143, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 143, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(26, 143, 573)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 143, 574)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 142, 574)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3327 724795 264645 201213 347672 106478 331271 348466 179692 018682 965759 526308 830756 734787 152653 701472 409218 818095 741332 161774 454066 891344 508321 > 9142 [i]