Best Known (52, 143, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 143, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 143, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 143, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 143, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 143, 2233)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 143, 2234)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 142, 2234)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3230 831775 337667 141096 013588 655065 204232 811811 427144 895148 988903 717997 296581 824556 229973 409369 030325 754670 437381 114003 476427 878942 275089 > 9142 [i]