Best Known (64, 143, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64, 143, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 143, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
(64, 143, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 143, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 143, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(64, 143, 5714)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 143, 5715)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 142, 5715)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3199 500983 517467 702058 123825 849717 202501 794277 352972 568638 409335 944646 227878 946533 422969 928548 526139 071301 532267 137039 570486 002508 777129 > 9142 [i]