Best Known (65, 145, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65, 145, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 145, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 145, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 145, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (65, 145, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 145, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 145, 5648)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 145, 5649)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 322211 597448 763756 247639 532707 921637 063685 201360 797732 220311 962757 922872 126038 620279 900250 077118 056158 516976 345082 822913 072366 365976 571969 > 9145 [i]