Best Known (103, 146, s)-Nets in Base 9
(103, 146, 776)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 146, 776)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 28, 36)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 35)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (75, 118, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 59, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (7, 28, 36)-net over F9, using
(103, 146, 4305)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (103, 146, 4305)-net over F9, using
(103, 146, 4209384)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 146, 4209385)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 145, 4209385)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 318274 192948 527950 954296 658586 436314 462884 652383 260738 075229 207657 227806 418652 900288 625634 032271 948978 353046 146788 466408 714385 067547 422569 > 9145 [i]