Best Known (109, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(109, 149, 814)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (109, 149, 814)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (17, 37, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (72, 112, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 56, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 56, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (17, 37, 74)-net over F9, using
(109, 149, 8531)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (109, 149, 8531)-net over F9, using
(109, 149, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (109, 149, large)-net in base 9, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (109, 111, large)-net in base 9, but