Best Known (22, 38, s)-Nets in Base 9
(22, 38, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 38, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (22, 40, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 116)-net over F81, using
(22, 38, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (22, 38, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 19, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(22, 38, 16037)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 38, 16038)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 825474 066798 399479 757484 871033 711745 > 938 [i]