Best Known (33, 48, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 48, 400)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 48, 400)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 16, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 8, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (17, 32, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (9, 16, 200)-net over F9, using
(33, 48, 1420)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 48, 1420)-net over F9, using
(33, 48, 1078658)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 48, 1078659)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 47, 1078659)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 706 967572 368672 203796 459176 568788 641353 396265 > 947 [i]