Best Known (28, 49, s)-Nets in Base 9
(28, 49, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 49, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 116)-net over F81, using
(28, 49, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (28, 49, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 50, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 136)-net over F81, using
(28, 49, 21534)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 49, 21535)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 48, 21535)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6364 216466 948113 977255 173169 547400 184033 416625 > 948 [i]