Best Known (36, 53, s)-Nets in Base 9
(36, 53, 364)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 53, 364)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 52, 364)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 16, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 8, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (19, 36, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 18, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 18, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (8, 16, 164)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(36, 53, 1239)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 53, 1239)-net over F9, using
(36, 53, 750194)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 53, 750195)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 52, 750195)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 745871 826967 510105 184547 336962 609645 729000 128193 > 952 [i]