Best Known (26, 63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(26, 63, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 63, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 63, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(26, 63, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 63, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(26, 63, 1816)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 63, 1817)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 62, 1817)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 145780 472315 870319 161079 254082 077737 329599 455552 123124 501841 > 962 [i]