Best Known (36, 63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(36, 63, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 63, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 64, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 150)-net over F81, using
(36, 63, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 63, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 64, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 154)-net over F81, using
(36, 63, 25187)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 63, 25188)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 62, 25188)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 145584 829193 916036 100001 124032 025601 539550 456287 165736 084385 > 962 [i]