Best Known (47, 70, s)-Nets in Base 9
(47, 70, 364)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 70, 364)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 22, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (25, 48, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (11, 22, 164)-net over F9, using
(47, 70, 1241)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (47, 70, 1241)-net over F9, using
(47, 70, 593775)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 70, 593776)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 69, 593776)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 696200 716367 742946 018934 317889 057916 895319 248181 543551 970802 462849 > 969 [i]