Best Known (40, 75, s)-Nets in Base 9
(40, 75, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 75, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 116)-net over F81, using
(40, 75, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 75, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 118)-net over F81, using
(40, 75, 12772)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 75, 12773)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 74, 12773)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41142 385077 283939 582262 759124 282822 766014 706678 110553 719871 033541 037993 > 974 [i]