MinT - Best Known (37, 86, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (37, 86, s)-Nets in Base 9

(37, 86, 81)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (37, 86, 81)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 86, 81)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
    - F₄ from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F₉ [i]

(37, 86, 84)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive

(37, 86, 84)-net in base 9, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 87, 84)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (8, 58, 84)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 83)-sequence over F₂₇, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(37, 86, 128)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (37, 86, 128)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 86, 128)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(37, 86, 2922)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (37, 86, 2923)-net in base 9, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 85, 2923)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9^mÂ â‰¥ 1296 723396 461252 293955 148109 315576 614534 092003 099498 259801 139157 381104 127784 249921 > 9⁸⁵ [i]