Best Known (46, 87, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 87, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 87, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 88, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 44, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 44, 116)-net over F81, using
(46, 87, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 87, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 88, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 44, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 44, 118)-net over F81, using
(46, 87, 13154)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 87, 13155)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 86, 13155)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11625 447078 011091 273675 758432 553248 728414 868523 392360 638071 417320 367258 394186 584801 > 986 [i]