Best Known (71, 88, s)-Nets in Base 9
(71, 88, 7411)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (71, 88, 7411)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 12, 30)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (59, 76, 7381)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(976, 7381, F9, 17, 17) (dual of [(7381, 17), 125401, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(976, 59049, F9, 17) (dual of [59049, 58973, 18]-code), using
- an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 59048 = 95−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(976, 59049, F9, 17) (dual of [59049, 58973, 18]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(976, 7381, F9, 17, 17) (dual of [(7381, 17), 125401, 18]-NRT-code), using
- digital (4, 12, 30)-net over F9, using
(71, 88, 150593)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (71, 88, 150593)-net over F9, using
(71, 88, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (71, 88, large)-net in base 9, because
- 15 times m-reduction [i] would yield (71, 73, large)-net in base 9, but