Best Known (44, 89, s)-Nets in Base 9
(44, 89, 106)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 89, 106)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 27, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 62, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 27, 32)-net over F9, using
(44, 89, 172)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (44, 89, 172)-net over F9, using
(44, 89, 7412)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 89, 7413)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 88, 7413)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 942181 237916 047856 404456 671802 116016 971593 004450 146095 392962 684760 984075 619734 399153 > 988 [i]