Best Known (37, 94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(37, 94, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 94, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 94, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(37, 94, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (37, 94, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 94, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(37, 94, 2069)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 94, 2070)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 93, 2070)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 56074 918864 294112 819805 160702 739366 330613 504042 442773 584267 991509 696453 070883 041737 381825 > 993 [i]