Best Known (52, 95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 95, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 95, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 96, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 48, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 48, 150)-net over F81, using
(52, 95, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 95, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (52, 96, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 48, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 48, 154)-net over F81, using
(52, 95, 20253)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 95, 20254)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 94, 20254)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 499982 516255 749308 401788 801336 205616 252448 471643 320137 128834 630675 695652 209632 746512 123953 > 994 [i]