Best Known (54, 96, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 96, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 96, 320)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 98, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 49, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 49, 160)-net over F81, using
(54, 96, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 96, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 48, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
(54, 96, 24970)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 96, 24971)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 486442 760488 163155 501352 244721 159437 851589 254838 490505 757106 420681 912611 287785 382483 326009 > 996 [i]