Information on Result #1146247
Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 85) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 86]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(275, 13, F2, 6, 69) (dual of [(13, 6), 3, 70]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(257, 10, F2, 6, 53) (dual of [(10, 6), 3, 54]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 84) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 83) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 81) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 82]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 80) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 81]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OOA(292, 15, F2, 6, 84) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
7 | Linear OOA(291, 15, F2, 6, 83) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OOA(286, 14, F2, 6, 78) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OOA(285, 14, F2, 6, 77) | [i] | ||
10 | Linear OOA(281, 14, F2, 6, 73) (dual of [(14, 6), 3, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
11 | Linear OOA(280, 13, F2, 6, 72) | [i] | ||
12 | Linear OOA(279, 13, F2, 6, 71) | [i] |