Information on Result #2917889
Linear OOA(285, 14, F2, 6, 77), using 8 step truncation based on linear OOA(293, 16, F2, 6, 85) (dual of [(16, 6), 3, 86]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(275, 13, F2, 6, 69) (dual of [(13, 6), 3, 70]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(257, 10, F2, 6, 53) (dual of [(10, 6), 3, 54]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 2 times [i] based on linear OOA(227, 5, F2, 6, 26) (dual of [(5, 6), 3, 27]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 3, F2, 6, 15) (dual of [(3, 6), 3, 16]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.