Information on Result #1304209
Linear OA(368, 271, F3, 19) (dual of [271, 203, 20]-code), using 2 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0) based on linear OA(367, 268, F3, 19) (dual of [268, 201, 20]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([239,12]), C2 = C([0,15]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,12]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([239,15]) [i] based on
- linear OA(351, 242, F3, 16) (dual of [242, 191, 17]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,12}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(351, 242, F3, 16) (dual of [242, 191, 17]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(361, 242, F3, 19) (dual of [242, 181, 20]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = {−3,−2,…,15}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(341, 242, F3, 13) (dual of [242, 201, 14]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,3) [i]
- linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code) (see above)
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.