Information on Result #1854864

There is no (89, m, 2830)-net in base 32 for arbitrarily large m, because m-reduction would yield (89, 5657, 2830)-net in base 32, but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 2829)-sequence in base 32 [i]Net from Sequence
2No (89, 89+k, 2830)-net in base 32 for arbitrarily large k [i]Logical Equivalence (for Nets with Unbounded m)
3No (89, m, 2830)-net in base 32 with unbounded m [i]
4No digital (89, 89+k, 2830)-net over F32 for arbitrarily large k [i]
5No digital (89, m, 2830)-net over F32 with unbounded m [i]